Tell Us Where YOU Stand on the Cheeseburger Bill!

The U.S. House of Representatives recentlyassociated with the person's weight gain or
passed a bill that protects fast-food chains fromobesity."
being sued by people who claim the food madeNo, The Cheeseburger Bill is Unnecessary
them fat. If the bill, the "Personal Responsibility inThose who are against the bill say fast-food
Food Consumption Act" - better known incompanies should be held accountable for selling
Congress as the "cheeseburger bill" -- is made intoharmful products, and passing the bill would
law, obesity-related lawsuits against bothunfairly give restaurants and food manufacturers
restaurants and food manufacturers would bespecial rights.
banned. (Legal action could still be taken if"Congress has allowed the need of big
contaminated food makes a person sick.)corporations before the need of our children," said
To date, a handful of lawsuits have been filed thatRep. Bob Filner, D-California.
blame restaurant food and advertising for obesity.Further, they say courts are functioning fine
Only one such case -- filed in 2002 and allegingwithout the bill and dismissing cases that sound
that McDonald's misleading advertising causedfrivolous. Passing the bill could give food
teens in New York to eat too much of the foodmanufacturers free reign to produce any type of
and become obese -- remains open.product.
Yes, We Need The Cheeseburger Bill ...Bill opponents point out that obesity is a major
The bill passed 306 to 120 in the House - -theproblem facing the nation, with close to two-thirds
second time they've passed the bill. The same billof U.S. adults and 15 percent of children now
was passed back in March 2004 but not actedoverweight. Some 30 percent of adults are
upon in the Senate. About 20 states have alreadyconsidered obese.
passed similar legislation."Congress is headed in the wrong direction with
Bill proponents say it's a person's ownthis bill, which removes any and all incentives for
responsibility to choose what they do and do notthe food industry to improve the healthiness of
eat, and such matters don't belong in court.their products," says Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif.
"As one judge put it, if a person knows or shouldMeanwhile, McDonald's isn't waiting for the bill to
know that eating copious orders of super-sizedbecome law before they take some responsibility
McDonald's products is unhealthy and could resultof their own. The fast-food giant announced that
in weight gain, it is not the place of the law tobeginning in 2006 they will be including nutrition
protect them from their own excesses," said Rep.facts information on most of their fast-food
James Sensenbrenner, R-Wisconsin, chairman ofpackages. l"> Please Let Us Know What YOU
the House Judiciary Committee.Think!
"We should not encourage lawsuits that blameSelect answers will be published in the forthcoming
others for our own choices and could bankrupt anissue of the e-newsletter!* *NOTE: Your answer,
entire industry," Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texasor an excerpt thereof, may be published in a
noted.forthcoming issue of the e-newsletter and on the
The Whitehouse also backs the bill and said in awebsite. By submitting your answer you authorize
statement, "Food manufacturers, marketers,this. Please include your name and your city state
distributors, advertisers and sellers should not be(or country) location to be included in the
held liable for injury because a person'spublication of select answers!
consumption of legal, unadulterated food is